<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Arm on AutoSpotting</title><link>https://autospotting.io/tags/arm.html</link><description>Recent content in Arm on AutoSpotting</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:58:55 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://autospotting.io/tags/arm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How can Arm chips like AWS Graviton or Apple M1/2 be faster and cheaper than x86 chips from Intel or AMD</title><link>https://autospotting.io/blog/leanercloud/2023-10-25-arm-graviton-performance.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://autospotting.io/blog/leanercloud/2023-10-25-arm-graviton-performance.html</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-arm-priceperformance-paradox"&gt;The Arm price/performance paradox&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my cost optimization gigs I often see how many people don&amp;rsquo;t understand how Arm chips (such as AWS Graviton and Apple M1/M2) can be both cheaper and faster than x86 chips from Intel and AMD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s counter-intuitive, so many think that since Graviton is ~20% cheaper, it must also be slower.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To explain this paradox, imagine two development teams:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Team x86 has 4 engineers and 6 managers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Team Arm has 6 engineers and 2 managers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s how you can get 50% more output at 20% less costs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>